Thames Valley Police insist Andrew probe presses on 'at pace' despite High Court ruling that raids were unlawful

From the Newshound archive · first published 9 October 2026.

A High Court judge has ruled that search warrants used to raid Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor's Sandringham and Royal Lodge homes in February were unlawful, after Thames Valley Police admitted they were issued under the wrong section of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act. Mr Justice Hilliard quashed the warrants and declared the searches and all seized material unlawful, dealing the force a significant embarrassment. Thames Valley Police insist the criminal investigation into alleged misconduct in public office is continuing "at pace," with a private hearing set for 2027 to determine whether they can lawfully retain the seized evidence. Andrew, who was arrested on his 66th birthday on suspicion of sharing sensitive information with Jeffrey Epstein during his time as UK trade envoy, denies all wrongdoing.

The 2027 private hearing means Andrew could remain in legal limbo for over a year before learning if he faces charges.

A legal expert called it 'extraordinary' that police are fighting to keep evidence seized under warrants they now admit were unlawful.

Andrew opposes police retaining the evidence, and is reportedly funding substantial legal bills while living quietly at Marsh Farm on the Sandringham Estate.